The News Wheel

US Transportation Agencies Submit Proposal to Limit Heavy Duty Truck Speeds

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

Study Semi Truck Drivers in Short Supply as Demand Keeps Increasing

On August 26th, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the Department of Transportation issued a notice of a proposed new regulation which would require automakers to equip Heavy Duty Trucks with electronic speed limiters. This is largely an action to increase the safety of motorists in the event of a crash, as impact force increases relative to speed, especially if the vehicle in question is a semi with a trailer attached that has difficulty stopping quickly no matter what.

Basically, the agencies argue, to lower the risk of deaths in crashes with heavy duty vehicles, simply limit the speed of the heavy duty vehicles.

Can’t Argue With Facts: And the fact is, the Volvo XC90 just has better specs than the Ford Explorer

This has other benefits for trucks, though, especially since earlier this month the government passed new regulations requiring trucks and buses (by some estimates some of the worst polluters on the road) to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions by 25%. Limiting speed would both limit extra fuel spent maintaining higher speeds and the need for trucks to stomp on the brakes and accelerate back up to speed.

This wouldn’t be a law to limit the speed of anything called “heavy duty,” of course—this would only affect new vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 26,000 pounds. The NHTSA hasn’t settled on a speed to set the limiter at, but is mulling over the costs and benefits of slowing heavy duty vehicles to 60, 65, or 68 mph.

Interestingly, trucking organizations seem to be on board, with the American Trucking Association telling that “Speed is a factor in a third of all vehicle crashes and 23 percent of all truck crashes, so slowing our vehicles down can have tremendous safety benefits.” In other words, at least the ATA seems willing to sacrifice some driving time for safer roads.

Looking at the Long Term: Let’s cast that long gaze back at the history of Volvo

News Sources: Jalopnik, USDOT

  • jcwconsult

    This is a proposal started by petitions from two of the organizations for the large trucking firms. They want to limit speeds in order to get more competitive with the independent truckers who are both more efficient AND have better safety records than the large trucking firms. It is NOT about safety, it is about $$$$$.

    NO ONE should support this proposal that will increase the prices of shipping by truck and will be passed on in the prices of almost everything we buy in stores. The proposal is a financial scam.

    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Rambo

    It can be more danagerous as you limit the truck to move with traffic! As you cause cars and trucks to back up! A Limit to stop High Speed is one thing! 100 MPH But No truck should be limited to drive with traffic!

  • Mark Deal Redline Services

    The ATA doesn’t speak for the entire industry. The ATA is self serving and has their bottom line as the driving factor.
    Limiting all trucks to the same speed will hinder the movement of freight, raise rates, and creat traffic issues. The ATA is very interested in helping the small operators go out of business. Less competition for them will put them in the drivers seat and the market will be at their mercy.