The News Wheel

EPA Keeps Renewable Fuel Standard the Same, Disappoints Everyone

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

EPA head Scott Pruitt

The EPA under Scott Pruitt and the Trump administration has had a decidedly dour effect on green fuel regulations, and has generally been seen as favoring petroleum interests. However, a recent ruling by the EPA on how much renewable fuel the government requires to be mixed into our fuel, known as the Renewable Fuel Standard, has seemed to rebuke the oil industry.

Really, though, the decision didn’t exactly favor the renewable sector very strongly—in the final ruling, Pruitt simply kept the status quo, leaving the mandate for renewable fuels like corn-based ethanol at 15 billion gallons.

As the Washington Post pointed out, this hasn’t really made either side of the debate happy. On the one hand, petroleum advocates who were pushing for a relaxing of standards (which has been the norm for the current administration’s regulatory approach) were disappointed that the EPA hadn’t reversed the steadily-advancing percentage of renewable fuels. Chet Thompson, president of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers called the move “bowing the knee to King Corn.”

On the other hand, biofuel producers were unhappy that the EPA didn’t increase renewable volume—Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa lamented that “renewable volume obligations fall short of the full potential of the US biofuels industry.”

Of course, according to the Washington Post, neither side can really publicly admit to being anything other than disappointed by the result, as the Renewable Fuel Standard is set annually, and neither side wants to undermine next year’s chances by appearing satisfied.

News Sources: Green Car Reports, Washington Post